Link Indexing Services Mini Roundup

A month ago I published a post with the title, You’re Link Building For Nothing, and in that post I showed how important it is to help the links you create get indexed. If you haven’t read that post yet than I recommend you do but in I will also summarize it here by saying that after checking more than 15,000 pingbacks I got to this blog I found that only 17.52% are indexed.

Since I had plenty of not indexed URLs with my links live on these pages I figured I could do a little indexing service roundup and see which indexing service will provide the best results. I ended up testing 3 services so this isn’t a real roundup as some services stayed out for various reasons but I the 3 I tested are the most popular ones as far as I know so I think it should still be information you can use and learn from.

I divided my big not indexed URL list to several lists each with 1500 URLs that contain my live links and are not indexed. I double checked that for every list just to make sure.

I tested the indexing rates using Scrapebox and I used proxies from Proxy Bonanza. It seems that the interface of Nuclear Link Indexer is a little more complicated than the other 2 but I didn’t really went into details. I just uploaded my URL list and left it for 30 days since I also wanted to test how easy and simple these services are to use.

The Results

Nuclear Link Indexer – 10.66% Indexed

Link Indexing Services Mini RoundupLink Indexing Services Mini Roundup

According to the Nuclear Link Indexer interface, the indexing rate is 73.87%. I really don’t know where the big difference comes from so I asked how they are testing the indexing rates and here is the reply I received from Kow Kok Choon:

We use a list of proxy urls and submit your links to google and perform the search through those proxy and if your links exists in google search, means that it is being indexed. we’ve tested our checking for so many times and adjusted it for several times when google has changes, so I’m confident that our check is accurate.

Backlinks Indexer – 4.00% Indexed

Link Indexing Services Mini RoundupLink Indexing Services Mini Roundup

I also asked them to explain the low indexing rate and so far I didn’t receive a reply. If and when I will receive one I will share it here.

Backlink Indexing – 0.006% Indexed

Link Indexing Services Mini RoundupLink Indexing Services Mini Roundup

As with the other 2 services, I asked for an explanation for the very very low indexing rate and I’m still waiting for a reply. Once I will get one it will be posted here.

Update: Ryan has replied and didn’t have an answer to explain the low index rates but he did provide me with a full refund which I found to be pretty awesome and I truly appreciate that. I know for a fact that not many would have done the same.

Linklicious.me – 0.006% Indexed

Link Indexing Services Mini RoundupLink Indexing Services Mini Roundup

As you can see, Linklicious.me didn’t really bring any different or good results. The service is more about getting your links crawled which should also help them get indexed but that doesn’t seem to be the case.

Test Group

I also kept a list of 1500 URLs that I didn’t touch and didn’t try to get indexed in any way just to see if some of these URLs will still be indexed during these 30 days and I guess it could be considered as a test group.

Link Indexing Services Mini Roundup

Conclusion

Wow. That is what I thought when I saw these crappy results. I was a little worried for a second that I might have done something wrong but when you think about it, all I had to do is to simply load the URL lists to each service and that is something a 6 year old can do so I really doubt if I screwed up the results somehow.

The only thing I can think of is that Scrapebox is to blame but since I don’t know of any other way to check the indexing rates of mass amounts of URLs, I don’t really see how I can do this test without it. Plus, I know that many others are using Scrapebox as the only tool for checking indexing rates so I never really put much thought into how accurate it really is.

In order to check how accurate Scrapebox really is I run each URL list 3 times in order to see if there will be any big differences. As you can see from the screenshots above there are no big differences so the only real way is to simply check manually every URL in Google with site: search operator and see what the real indexing rate is. That is a bit to much for me an in either case, no one is really going to check this way and in order to know if these services are really providing what the users are paying for you need to be able to easily check indexing rates. I only know one tool for the job and that is Scrapebox.

What’s Next?

I am planning to test more link indexing services so if you would like me to test specific services feel free to let me know. I would also love to know if you used either of these services? Did you get better results? Do you know of a different way to check indexing rates (without Scrapebox)?

Please share by commenting below.

To your success (and mine Link Indexing Services Mini Roundup ),

Link Indexing Services Mini Roundup

We recommend:

Find keywords with Long Tail Pro and/or Ultimate Niche Finder.

Get SEO content with Ultra Spinnable Articles & Article Builder.

Check out What's Working Now & Tools of The Trade and be sure to subscribe via RSS to stay updated :).

{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }

Chris Fong January 25, 2012 at 20:35

Hey Dave. I’ve been testing Nuclear Link Indexer and Backlinks Indexer myself, and I’ve noticed the same crappy indexing rates. So I don’t think it’s just you. :)

One other thing to consider though. Did you filter out the sites that are dead? That could be influencing your indexing rates too.
Chris Fong recently posted..5 Traffic Sources That Helped Me Reach 10,000 Visitors A Month

Reply

Dave Baker January 25, 2012 at 21:22

Hi Chris, good to know I wasn’t the only one to notice these low indexing rates. Before I created the list I filtered all the dead URLs and made sure to submit only live URLs with live links to my blog.

Reply

Enrico January 26, 2012 at 14:50

Thank you!!

What about using resource boxes with spintax and UAW and then pass the list of submitted articles on pingfarm? (maybe 15,000 urls are too much)

Reply

Dave Baker January 26, 2012 at 15:10

Hi Enrico, as you said, when we are talking about massive amounts of links that won’t produce any good results. Among the link I am looking to get indexed are links that I create using UAW so using UAW in order to get their own links indexed doesn’t make much sense.

Reply

Paul January 26, 2012 at 18:40

Hi Dave, I’m already having second thoughts of dropping my nuclear link indexer and backlinks indexer subscriptions as I’m experiencing the same. Wonder if you’re using backlinks energizer? I’ve also tried IndexBear before (service), but that was months ago and not sure how’s their performance right now. And what I’m currently interested in is Chris Munch’s – LinkClaw, perhaps you would like to try it as well. =)

Reply

Dave Baker January 26, 2012 at 19:10

Hi Paul, thanks for the suggestions. I will surly add them to the list :)

Reply

Sunshine January 27, 2012 at 05:06

hi dave, i am using backlink index engine..and every full moon i pick random urls to see if they are index and they are… unfortunately i dont have scrapebox yet to check a big list of urls.. but you may want to try BIE out also.. if you have 5-10 indexed, idel wordpress blogs, you can use those.
Sunshine recently posted..SenukeX Review and Unbelievable $167+ Bonus!!

Reply

Dave Baker January 27, 2012 at 13:38

Hi Sunshine, do you mean Backlink Index Express?

Reply

Sunshine January 28, 2012 at 09:53

right, that’s what I meant :)
Sunshine recently posted..SenukeX Review and Unbelievable $167+ Bonus!!

Reply

Dmitry January 27, 2012 at 18:17

You could perform index check using Market Samurai, just go to their “SEO competition” research module uncheck all check boxes except “Google Cache Age” and add your url as “Custom Urls”. If url was indexed by Google there will be a date stamp if not the field will be blank. I wouldn’t load all 15 000 urls all at once but it can handle 1500. It is not the fastest way but could be used to compare results with Scrapebox to see if the difference between two services will be significant.
Dmitry
Dmitry recently posted..BackupBuddy Review

Reply

Dave Baker January 27, 2012 at 21:01

Hi Dmitry, thanks for telling me about this option. I just tired it out on the 1500 URLs for NLI and it found 154 URLs that are cached (indexed) so there is no big difference in the results from what I got from Scrapebox. I wouldn’t recommend using Market Samurai for checking indexing rates if you have large numbers of URLs but for a few hundreds at a time it could work fine.

Thanks again :)

Reply

Mathis January 27, 2012 at 19:02

Hey Dave, actually its the fault of Scrapebox. I use Backlink Energizer to index my links and when I checked with Scrapebox, it showed only 5% index rate so I started to check my links manually and surprisingly, my index rate is almost 90-94%.

Reply

Jon January 27, 2012 at 19:19

Thanks for going over these Dave, I have just been looking at an indexing service to use myself.

I have seen Backlink Booster and Linklicious, would be great if you could take a look at these!

cheers

Jon

Reply

Billy Reinheart January 27, 2012 at 21:44

Interesting study but perhaps the issue is more with the checker than the service? I’ve used NLI and had pretty good results. I’m using backlinks indexer currently and I usually get over 70% indexed each month. I should note I use Andy’s index checker though.

Reply

Dave Baker January 28, 2012 at 01:28

Hi Billy, like I said, that could be the case but I really don’t know of any other tool.

Can you provide me with a link to the tool you are using to check the indexing rates?

Reply

Neil Ashworth January 28, 2012 at 01:41

Nice article Dave – very useful.

I have a question – are you using a tool to scrape/collect the ping back urls? I have been looking at ways of doing this and so far have been collecting pingbacks manually in a .txt file! I guess there has to be an easier way ;-)

By the way, just went through your WP cloner link – very cool tool.

Neil
Neil Ashworth recently posted..The Secret Book | 5 Secrets To Changing Your Life

Reply

Neil Ashworth January 28, 2012 at 01:43

Dave! Scratch my last comment.. just found your plugin ;-)
Neil Ashworth recently posted..The Secret Book | 5 Secrets To Changing Your Life

Reply

Dave Baker January 28, 2012 at 01:45

It is scratched :)

Reply

Perig Vennetier January 31, 2012 at 04:36

Hey Dave, interesting experiment.

I am not sure why you are seeing such low indexing rates. I think the types of links you are trying to index also have a big impact on indexing rates (not sure what your were). I have done similar experiments for myself especially with NLI because this is what I use right now (so hands off for me I really like it).

Here are some results I got from the previous month indexing:
- Pingbacks and trackbacks (mix of articles sites, blog networks and spun pligg bookmarks): 67%
- Spun bookmarks (created with drip feed blast): 54 to 60%
- AMR livelinks: 40 to 60%

I also double checked the links reported as indexed with Scrapebox and proxies and I find that I get an average of about 92% of the reported indexed links that are actually indexed so very good accuracy.

Not sure what could have gone wrong with your experiment. You can contact me on Skype (perig1) if you are interested in discussing more about this.
Perig Vennetier recently posted..Starting 2012 With a Cruise and a New 100 Day Champion Challenge!

Reply

Dave Baker January 31, 2012 at 11:40

Hi Perig,

Thanks for sharing your own results and it is good to see that you are getting such high indexing rates.

The links I tried to index are all pingbacks (blog networks and such) so if you are getting 67% index rate for these that is what I should have gotten, right?

The only explanation I have is that Scrapebox is not as accurate as everyone thinks it is but until someone proves that, it is only an assumption.

Reply

Bence February 9, 2012 at 22:11

Why not blast your links with Scrapebox and Xrumer? Or you could automate this task with the service called Drip Feed Links, or Dripable, or Drip Feed Blasts.

Reply

Dave Baker February 10, 2012 at 02:37

That is an option but since they are services that are meant to help get your links indexed, I figured I would give them a try instead of coming up with an indexing solution of my own.

Reply

Carol March 14, 2012 at 14:05

This is really interesting research – I’ll have to rethink some of what I do. Thanks for posting
Carol recently posted..Hostgator Hosting For Only 1 Cent!

Reply

Param April 17, 2012 at 12:38

Hi, I have a site where i add lot of pages on daily basis basis, each of these page target different US city.

However, since site is new, these pages are getting indexed at lower rate.

I wanted to know if its safe to add the sites URLS to the networks like Linklecious, Backlink Indexer etc for faster indexing?

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge